Gonzaga, G. C., Haselton, Yards. Grams., Smurda, J., Davies, Yards. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Advancement and you may People Choices, 29(2), 119–126.
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. M. (2000). The spot out of attachment inside individual mating. Overview of General Psychology, 4(2), 186–204.
Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A great. (2002). Internet paradox reviewed. Journal out-of Public Points, 58(1), 49–74.
Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, Yards., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Sites paradox: A personal tech one minimizes social involvement and mental well-are? Western Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
Kreider, R.Meters., & Sphere, J. Meters. (2001). Count, time, and duration of marriage ceremonies and divorces. Latest Inhabitants Reports, 70-80, (Arizona, DC: U.S. Census Agency, 2005).
Lemieux, Roentgen., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional research off closeness, welfare, and you will relationship: Analysis the new presumptions of your own triangular concept off love. Emotional Records, 90(step 3,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.ninety.step three.1009-1014
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Elizabeth. (2004). Perception most readily useful regarding the creating even worse: Societal contrasting within this romantic relationship. “Like, focus, additionally the suppression out-of view regarding close selection” bővebben