In so far as i understand, there is nothing questionable towards dating measures advised regarding the foregoing
Japanese Diary Postmarks
This new quantity show reign several years of japan Emperors. These reign-year/Gregorian schedule sales is actually highly relevant to prewar Japanese photo postcards (1900-1945):
Using the rules established in significantly more than section having Symptoms I-IV, it certainly is obvious and therefore reign months a postcard drops toward. Eg, 12 months “10” can’t be Meiji 10 (1877), because there was basically zero photo postcards when you look at the 1877. In case the postcard try Period III (1918-1933) [it has a good “ka” unlike a beneficial “ga” during the “hagaki”], following “10” mode “Taisho ten” or 1921. But not, whether your credit was Months IV (1933-1945), it is “Showa 10” or 1935.
The number “7” around column would make a card both 1918 (Taisho 7) or 1932 (Showa 7), each of and this end up in Several months III. In general, postcards from 1918 and you can 1932 was well enough different when it comes to lithographic technology, thematic focus, and other items to create a decision you can easily.
Gregorian Schedule Postmarks
The brand new composed message was dated “Late. 2,” so her response we is also infer that “3.11” means step 3 November, and therefore the credit are postmarked for the November 3, 1923. That it time are consistent with the Months III marks to your remaining portion of the cards.
Pursuing the laws detailed significantly more than, we ascertain your page is closed by a page-author titled Nobuyuki in the Busan [“Fusan”], Korea to your December 10th, 1911. The brand new card arrived in Shimonoseki, Japan to the December 11th, and also in Kobe, Japan into the December 12th, and most likely arrived in The brand new Bedford, MA, Us on January 11th, 1912. “In so far as i understand, there is nothing questionable towards dating measures advised regarding the foregoing” bővebben