Gonzaga, G. C., Haselton, Yards. Grams., Smurda, J., Davies, Yards. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Advancement and you may People Choices, 29(2), 119–126.
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. M. (2000). The spot out of attachment inside individual mating. Overview of General Psychology, 4(2), 186–204.
Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A great. (2002). Internet paradox reviewed. Journal out-of Public Points, 58(1), 49–74.
Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, Yards., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Sites paradox: A personal tech one minimizes social involvement and mental well-are? Western Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
Kreider, R.Meters., & Sphere, J. Meters. (2001). Count, time, and duration of marriage ceremonies and divorces. Latest Inhabitants Reports, 70-80, (Arizona, DC: U.S. Census Agency, 2005).
Lemieux, Roentgen., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional research off closeness, welfare, and you will relationship: Analysis the new presumptions of your own triangular concept off love. Emotional Records, 90(step 3,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.ninety.step three.1009-1014
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Elizabeth. (2004). Perception most readily useful regarding the creating even worse: Societal contrasting within this romantic relationship. Journal off Personality and Personal Therapy, 87(1), 80–95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A., & Gailliot, Yards. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: New implicit cognition out-of intimate competition. Log out of Personality and you can Personal Therapy, 97(1), 74–87.
An effective. (2001)mitment and you will matchmaking maintenance mechanisms
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A beneficial., & Gonzaga, Grams. C. (2008). Automated inattention so you’re able to glamorous choices: The fresh new progressed psychology of relationships repairs. Progression and you may Person Conclusion, 29(5), 343–349.
pold, B. Age. (1981). Sequential study regarding conflict and you will agreement when you look at the troubled and you may nondistressed marital partners. Journal away from Asking and you bedste sted at mГёde udenlandske kvinder til Г¦gteskaber can Scientific Psychology, 49(4), 554–567.
McKenna, K. Y. Good., Eco-friendly, A beneficial. S., Gleason, Yards. J. (2002). Relationship creation on the web: What’s the big destination? Diary out of Social Activities, 58(1), 9–30.
Some great benefits of confident illusions: Idealization and the structure from fulfillment for the close matchmaking
Neff, L. A beneficial., & Karney, B. R. (2002). Self-analysis purposes inside personal dating: A type of around the world enhancement and you can certain verification. For the P. Noller & J. An excellent. Feeney (Eds.), Wisdom ents regarding the study of few interaction (pp. 32–58). Ny, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The development of the customer-counselor thread from contact lens out-of attachment theory. Psychotherapy: Principle, Browse, Habit, Education, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). New public monitoring system: Enhanced susceptibility in order to societal signs since a transformative a reaction to personal different. Into the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The brand new social outcast: Ostracism, public different, rejection, and intimidation (pp. 213–226). Nyc, NY: Therapy Force.
Penetrate, T., & Lydon, J. Elizabeth. (2001). Around the world and you may certain relational designs regarding the experience of social affairs. Record off Character and Public Psychology, 80(4), 613–631.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A great., Tran, S., ). Attachment and you may recommendations trying to within the personal dating. Identity and Personal Mindset Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.
Ross, L. Roentgen., & Spinner, B. (2001). General and certain connection representations in the adulthood: Can there be a love?. Journal Regarding Personal And personal Relationship, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, Letter., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. In J. Harvey & A beneficial. Wenzel (Eds.), Close intimate matchmaking: Restoration and enhancement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, Good. D. (2000). Projection myself perception one of spouses once the a function of the latest resemblance inside their shared experiences. Character And you can Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, Roentgen. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1980). Results of salience out-of extrinsic benefits to your preference and you can enjoying. Log out-of Identification and you may Personal Therapy, 38(3), 453–460.